Tag Archives: tv
The Karl Stefanovic Phenomenon – why clickbait doesn’t rate
Posted in Uncategorized
Could comedy save us?
Currently, our national conversation feels like being stuck at a dinner party full of people tweeting into their mobile phones.
I’m talking about our political debate and the current state of our election campaign, the stupidity of which is becoming intolerable. And we need relief.
Why does Australia linger on pathetic, trivial stories for as long as we do? I realise we are a small country but we are big enough to know better.
Our water cooler conversation is truly tepid. We make scandals out of misquotes and feature stories out of insults when we all know the topic will usually have blown over in 24 hours.
This campaign lurches from one petty scandal to another, this week focusing on a sexist menu, a shocking shock jock, and our nation’s co-dependent relationship with Kevin Rudd.
It’s a cycle more vicious than Howard Sattler’s camera face.
Perhaps what we need is a good comic to make light of the day’s events, someone to skew the national conversation, to spike the watercooler before the 24-hour news cycle is through.
We’ve not had a sharp-shooter like this since Graham Kennedy. (I am excluding half-baked attempts like Steve Vizard, Mick Molloy and Rove – do remind me if I have missed someone).
I’d back Adam Hills, The Chaser team in their CNNNN format, or News Limited’s Joe Hildebrand. (Give that man a talk show, seriously.)
Stephen Colbert and John Stewart have been doing this for years in the US (albeit to a much larger audience) bringing a hilarious new perspective to issues the nightly news will leave you thinking are actually important. (Scroll down for a good example)
We need talented writers and fast-working producers who will expose the shallowness of it all, shining a light on how pointless all the political hypocrisy really is.
John Clark and Brian Dawe did a great job of this but this stuff needs to be nightly. And sharp. And popular. Like, Daryl Somers popular.
Please, I can’t get no relief. Soon, the only option will be to ignore people discussing these trivialities, which I’ll probably do by tweeting into my mobile.
Posted in political, Pop Culture
That awkward moment when Social Media appears on TV
If the addition of social media to a broadcast is not intended as a distraction to the main game, why is that so often the outcome?
This is something I have wondered as I look at Australia’s attempts and those by networks around the world.
I thought it was self-evident that viewer opinions, when integrated into a television programme, are there to enhance the primary content. But perhaps the pendulum has already swung too far.
Why is it that many shows that have tried out social media on-air are not using innovative techniques, not conjuring up their own clever use adaption of this new community, but instead throw up some clunky graphics or even use the frustrating ‘stop/read a tweet/continue with show’ method.
Exactly who benefits from that?
Poor implementation risks offending both sides. It shows those on social networks that you don’t understand how the stream flows relentlessly on, while those who’ve never signed up for Facebook or Twitter are peeved that their show has new awkward, trendy interruptions.
Good implementation can keep viewers hooked and boost ratings – The Voice in the US is seeing a great response from their use hosts and judges live-tweeting and responding personally to viewers.
One reason TV shows should and are trying to bring social media into the foreground is fear. It’s the fear of any switched on executive producer that the social media stream will become more entertaining than the show itself. People will watch their second screen (mobile devices) more than their first (TV).
Certainly, there’s no better influence for you to switch channels than if all your friends and those you follow are tweeting about #TheVoice.
Hence, broadcasters all over the world are battling with how to bring the social stream into the live TV event. They need to show viewers they are listening to their views, but some integrations of Twitter, especially, are wearing very thin.
I like the UFC‘s approach – use social media to build up hype for the event a week out. Have your main talent interacting with viewers on various platforms throughout the day and then following the event. They understand that owning the conversation is more about taking people in behind the wall of the TV screen than it is the chance to display a highlight reel of the sharpest or fastest tweeters.
Sadly, I think Australia’s one-time leader in this area is now dragging the chain.
QandA is making a mockery of what has become known as Social TV. The show, which can still command large audiences, has long held the torch for social media integration in our country.
Several programs still limit their social network integration to a back-announce of their hashtag as the show ends. (Bit late guys!)
(Lateline is the main offender there, but, I should say, I like the show’s latest idea to give a political or topical personality the reigns as ‘Guest Tweeter’. If you’re going to tell people to “join the conversation”, it makes sense to lead it. This limits carping and provides a loose thread people can join if they wish. If not, your hashtag is just an invitation for everyone to ‘Shout! Now!’)
But back to our beloved QandA.
Each week, an increasingly silly list of tweets are flipped up on the screen.
These days, it’s hard to spot any comment that adds to the discussion. Intelligent questions? Fact-checking? It’s more a procession of punch-lines that would never be appropriate to be read out loud on the show.
It’s more a ticker of sniping, witty retorts and clever word plays that often denigrate a guest. Cardinal Pell was a good example. As was John Howard…
It’s a technique that’s not showing the best side of Twitter, nor is it helping boost engagement for the audience watching at home.
Viewers, as a result, must now tolerate these tweets interrupting the actual debate, on top of Tony Jones’s regular interruptions of panelists (something he’s long been known for). Who benefits? No one but the wise guys who – no doubt – congratulate each other on their televised tweets the next day over the ad agency water cooler.
Imagine the real-life equivalent; You’re in a pub trying to enjoy the footy but you can’t hear the commentary because all the biggest smart-arses in the room have lined up to whisper their witty interjections in your ear.
Tweets that flash up and then disappear only adds to the distraction. (It’s very hard not to look at them. I tried hard and only skipped two. Tell me how you go.)
How about a ticker that continues scrolling in the bottom third – that way I can dip-in if I wish?
But how about some more creative uses of social media?
Get your hosts to tweet LIVE on air and ask for responses.
Give characters in a drama series real-life accounts, updated mid-week, to add to the storyline – and intrigue. (Packed to the Rafters recently started a character blogging – an interesting move.)
Contests can be easily managed via social media. Tweet your trivia answer to this hashtag… Find and LIKE our hidden Facebook page for the next clue… Start a Pinterest and name a Board after our show (Microsoft and Harrods have each tried something similar)
Philosopher Alain de Botton said that the main challenge of smartphones is for us to be more interesting than they are – to stop people’s eyes drifting back to their tiny screen.
The same goes for TV.
There are many ways we can take this Australia. Let’s not leave it as it is. Please?
Pretty soon, my second screen will be much more interesting than my first.
Posted in marketing, Social Media
TVs are the new old librarians [updated]
My recent experience of buying a new TV should have delivered me immense satisfaction and loads of testosterone as I made the biggest decision a married male can make on his own.
But somehow, my purchase of a Smart TV” left me feeling much dumber for it.
I work in TV but live most of my life online so in my humble opinion, my new “connected TV” should allow me to do both;
I want to tweet while I watch a show. I want to read my Facebook but keep streaming the news. I want also want to be able to browse the web using a keyboard and trackpad and it doesn’t seem ridiculous to me to expect a TV to be easily able to stream videos on my much smaller-screened Macbook.
But no. For the ten years since plasma TVs came out – and I have been biding my time – the best TV makers have developed is a pretty pixelated digital picture that is thinner and uses less energy.
3D-enabled or not? 50hz or 100hz? Internet-ready? Wifi-connected? What? Why??
Why are we way back here, deciding on small variations of nothingness when even the most sophisticated TV will still only deliver me a dodgy web browsing experience.
(Massive icons, a keypad on the remote with arrows to move the cursor around like a first generation Blackberry. And on most, you enter a URL using numbers like your first NOKIA in 1995!)
After visiting two or three stores, it became obvious that the coolest, $5000 LED-LCD TV won’t yet let me flick between websites, track tweets while I watch a show in the other part of the screen, post on Facebook while I continue watching my favourite show… you know, do what my notebook computer does.
When I went to university and completed my Applied Science in Information Studies, I knew the internet was going to change everything. But that’s all I knew. And the lecturers, who were clouded by years of teaching how information sharing worked the old way,had only just begun accepting essays via email.
TVs are now the librarians of old. The rusty Citroens choking up the info highway, delivering info as they always did and resisting new developments that threaten its mainstay.
It’s no wonder nearly 50% of teens now spend more time on their computers than watching TV. [citation coming]
Looks too me like televisions are an overheated area of glitzy marketing with pretty minimal delivery. There’s lots of jargon, stickers and selling points but I am getting a TV which does little more than the mournful, cumbersome CRT I now have sitting on my living room floor like an orphaned elephant. Yes, a white elephant.
Lucky for me, one clever thing my TV can do is turn itself off if it detects no movement in the room for thirty minutes.
And so far, to Sony’s credit, this has only occurred twice during my favourite show.
——-/——-
UPDATE!!
Unbelievable.
Now that I have finally received the WIFI dongle (which had to be transferred from another store) I find that the Sony WIDGETS work on my TV model and one is for Twitter!
This means I CAN have a twitter feed in the right of screen as the show – form any source – plays out on the left of screen. Joy of joys. And my apologies to Sony.
The interface is limited but hey, it’s all a step toward real social TV. Using Sony’s rather good iPhone app ‘Media Remote’ you can type and navigate the screen as good as one might hope.
Posted in Tech
Oprah’s finale suggest she’s bigger than Jesus
Pictures from Oprah’s Transfiguration – well, it sure looks like she’s bidding farewell to our dear planet.
Seriously, let’s remember. This is simply the final week of a TV show.
Yes, Oprah is a juggernaut of hype and elongated syllables but on a basic level, she is just a successful talk-show host.
I can’t help but compare her to Jesus. Well, at least evangelist Billy Graham – a man who attracted stadium size audiences in Australia fifty years ago.
I could run with that analogy further but isn’t it more enjoyable to poke fun and hold a pop-quiz with twitpics I found??
Just tell me this doesn’t look like HillSong but with more celebrities…
This is
a) The line up outside the Chicago Stadium
b) An unemployment queue
c) All of the above
This is
a) product placement
b) because your love for Oprah will make you cry she is having a career change
c) Hugh Jackman’s seat
This is
a) a superstar embracing an icon
b) the biggest surprise of the night
c) the scariest open-mouth kiss ever
This is
a) Oprah hugging Jerry Seinfeld!
b) Oprah thinking she’s hugging Nick Cage
c) Jerry eyeing the exits
This is
a) An evangelistic event
b) A rock concert
c) A lot of people hoping to get something expensive for free.
Posted in Uncategorized
Facebook delivers best reviews of ‘Farmer Needs A Wife’
Here are my favourite comments from the Channel 9 Facebook page tonight which rather foolishly suggested;
“It’s impossible not to love Farmer Wants a Wife. Shall we spread the Word?”
The commenting viewers chose to spread hilarious vitriol instead…
Robert Frederick Brewer impossible aye? well guess what. I can’t stand it and wont watch it. So there you go. Not impossible.
Leigh Fletcher I’d rather watch My Kitchen Rules facebook.com/MyKitchenRules
Jeff Gehrig I’m with you. Yet another example of 9 ignoring what the audience wants.
Warren Leadbeatter Ha! I’m not watching that shit either!
Nathan Retzlaff some of the sheilas look like the cows in the paddock
Rebecca March I am watching it for the first time, it’s so awkward!
Shannon Butler Should be called “The viewers need a life” .
For the record, I didn’t watch it as I am rather into My Kitchen Rules – at least I was until the unveiled ‘Group 2’ tonight, doubling the contestants and halving my commitment – but if the Farmer show appeals to you, go check out http://channelnine.ninemsn.com.au/thefarmerwantsawife/ if only to count the clichés.
And Channel 9 people, leaving your facebook page open for anyone to post on your wall is, evidently, an invitation for anyone to air their grievances on a popular and seemingly unmoderated public billboard – rarely a good branding exercise.
But a satisfying read, nonetheless.
Posted in Uncategorized